Go directly to the menu Site plan
  • Normal
  • Medium
  • Large

Les Archives de Radio-Canada

Home · Politics · Federal Politics · Pot and Politics: Canada and the Marijuana Debate

Topic spans: 1969 - 2003

Pot and Politics: Canada and the Marijuana Debate

In 1923 it became illegal for Canadians to possess marijuana. But the laws have always been flouted, by recreational users who just want to get high, and by medicinal users seeking relief from pain and illness. From cannabis cafés to courtrooms, doctors and patients, rabble-rousers and senior statesmen have engaged in a passionate debate over marijuana possession. But the laws have endured.

icone_tv
20 television clips
icone_micro
7 radio clips

Explosive report on drugs divides cabinet

Broadcast Date: June 21, 1970

For decades, Canadians of all stripes have argued that the penalties for marijuana possession far outweigh the seriousness of the crime. In 1969 Pierre Trudeau's Liberal government orders Canada's first serious look at changing the laws. In June 1970 the Commission of Inquiry into the Non-Medical Use of Drugs delivers its interim report, calling for the decriminalization of all drugs. Analysts call it "one of the most politically-explosive documents ever put before the government."

Going far beyond suggesting decriminalizing marijuana, commission chair Gerald LeDain recommends a mere fine of $100 for possession of any drug, including "hard drugs" like cocaine and heroin. That recommendation is immediately rejected. But Health Minister John Munro announces that his government will immediately look at moving marijuana out of the Criminal Code and into the Food and Drug Act. That's news to Justice Minister John Turner, who can barely contain his wrath.

Turner tersely tells reporters that his job is to enforce current laws, not the interim recommendations of a commission. As we hear in this Sunday Magazine report, Health Minister John Munro seems to have neglected to consult Turner or his cabinet before speaking to the media, and is "courting political suicide." Unfortunately, it appears the political rift will drown out LeDain's recommendations about drug education and "wise, informed freedom of choice."

Explosive report on drugs divides cabinet

• The LeDain commission's 320-page interim report argued that nobody should go to jail for possession of psychotropic drugs. But it did not recommend outright legalization because there had not been enough clinical study or public debate on the subject.
• The commission justified the decriminalization of hard drugs as well as marijuana because they felt that penalties for possession should not be based on how harmful a drug is to the user.

• The LeDain commission said drugs are so pervasive in Canada that government strategy should focus on frank drug education, not suppression. Chapter two of the interim report was an explicit explanation of what various drugs do — including any positive aspects. The commission argued that a careful, scientific explanation of the whole truth was the only responsible approach to drug education and worth the risk of sparking interest in drug experimentation.

• In the year following the release of the interim report, the commission studied drug education, treatment for drug abusers, and the costs of current drug law enforcement. The first report, on treatment, was published in January 1972. It included a first aid manual for treating drug users that was sent to every doctor in Canada. But many doctors saw this as an attack on their profession.

• The commission's final report was delivered in June 1972. The five members of the commission were split on the recommendations. The majority position was held by LeDain, Heinz Lehmann and J. Peter Stein. They argued that marijuana possession should be decriminalized because the law enforcement costs of attempting to prohibit it were too great. They said they hoped this would not promote marijuana use, but admitted this might be an incidental effect of decriminalization.

• Two members of the commission dissented. Marie-Andrée Bertrand thought the government should go further and provide a legal source for marijuana distribution. On the other hand, Ian Campbell felt the majority recommendation would be seen as an endorsement of the safety of marijuana and would result in increased use.

• Justice minister John Turner argued that the courts already had discretion to hand out summary convictions without jail time (and did so 90 per cent of the time) so there was no need to change the laws.
• Turner became finance minister in 1972. In 1984 he replaced Pierre Trudeau as prime minister, but was defeated in the federal election two months later.

• John Munro was responsible for establishing the commission of inquiry in 1969. His public enthusiasm for decriminalization did not end up being "political suicide" — just a blunder. His government ignored the LeDain commission's report, and Munro went on to be minister of Labour and Multiculturalism, Indian and Northern Affairs and eventually head of Transport Canada.

Explosive report on drugs divides cabinet

Medium: Radio

Program: Sunday Magazine

Broadcast Date: June 21, 1970

Guest(s): Frank Howard, Gerald LeDain, Barry Luger, Don Mazankowski, John Munro, John Turner


Host: John O'Leary
Reporter: Tim Ralfe, Peter Loucks

Duration: 28:05

Last updated:
Aug. 7, 2009


End of list




clips précédents
Activez le Javascript sur votre navigateur...
clips suivants
27 clips in this topic . page
Discover also
Marc Emery, Canada's 'Prince of Pot'
Television
7:15
Marijuana advocate Marc Emery describes his 1996 bust for selling marijuana seeds at his Vancouver hemp emporium.
Pushing Past Borders: Canada & International Drug Trafficking
Topic

Rum runners. Heroin connections. Ecstasy labs. All part of a long line of criminal dealings in the service of international drug trafficking that smear Canada's squeaky-clean image. As the international...