Go directly to the menu Site plan
  • Normal
  • Medium
  • Large

Les Archives de Radio-Canada

Home · For Teachers · David vs. Goliath

logo_prof
Project Overview
photo
11-12
David vs. Goliath
Project type: Assignment
Subjects
Science
Political Science
Summary
Using a courtroom setting, students role-play the legal fight of Monsanto vs. Percy Schmeiser.
Duration
2-3 lessons
Purpose
To obtain an overview of the GMO debate from different perspectives
Lesson Plan
Before Exploring
Review with students the role of genes in determining the traits of species. Review with students how traits are manipulated through breeding in order to obtain a desired outcome. Then explain that genetic engineering now bypasses the need to breed plants for several years in order to obtain stronger species. Instead one changes one or more genes or adds a gene to create a new species.

Hand out and have the students read the summary of the case of Monsanto versus Percy Schmeiser on the download sheet David vs Goliath. Tell students that they will be creating a courtroom re-enactment of the case in order to explore the issues surrounding genetic engineering.
Outline the Opportunity
Divide the class into two groups. One group is the team defending Percy Schmeiser, the other group is defending Monsanto. You will act as the judge.

Everyone in class will review clip 8 and the additional clip “Doubting the validity of Percy Schmeiser’s story” on Genetically Modified Food: A Growing Debate on the CBC Radio and Television Archives Web site. Group members can divide the rest of the clips amongst themselves to find supporting evidence for the case, along with evidence either supporting or opposing the biotech industry. Teams meet and consolidate their data. Each team chooses one to three representatives who will present their arguments in a courtroom setting. Witnesses are designated within the teams to help present aspects in the case.
Revisit and Reflect
As the presiding judge have each team present their case. Allow for opening remarks, the calling of experts and witnesses, questioning of witnesses, and closing remarks. Students may use any visual displays they feel would help their case. Bring down a ruling based on the evidence presented.
Extension
Students can write an essay explaining whether they felt the ruling made by the judge was fair. They can include opinions on whether biotech industries are beneficial or harmful to our current and future well-being.